Bringing History to Audiences with Autism Spectrum Disorder

History is for all of us, not just a select few. My institution, the Black Belt Museum at the University of West Alabama, began a pilot program two years ago on how to adjust our history programs to allow a wider audience to enjoy and learn about the past. Our most successful programs are living history interactive sessions based on 18th and early 19th century everyday life in Alabama. Most popular is our 18th century French Marine program. It chronicles the life of foreign soldiers stationed in remote La Louisiane thousands of miles away from home. Experiences of these men are similar to those of American soldiers sent to the Middle East. Through the course of attending history festivals I presented one my programs to a group of individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This led to a discussion with their teacher. From there, a pilot program began taking my history persona to these individuals and bring them to our history camp to learn about the past in a more engaging way. Through two years of research and practice, our museum is developing guidelines to train future staff to create new educational programs that embrace the diversity of audiences encountered in society. We have found that incorporating interactive methods of interpretation/education (touch, taste, sight, smell) helps in providing an engaging experience for the audience, along with an understanding of ASD so that we may better to recognize certain indicators (like a sensory overload) in order to not react negatively at the wrong time.

In redesigning the interpretive programs we seek to allow all individuals, not just those without intellectual disorders, to enjoy and learn about the past. Currently, standards for program development for those with intellectual disorders is limited to a discussion of the topic in the American Association of Museums publication, “Everyone’s Welcome: The American with Disabilities Act and Museums” from 1998, but nothing concrete was established in the text. In developing the programs we consulted local institutions such as Arts N Autism connected to the University of Alabama and Glenwood Autism and Behavioral Health Center where the programs were taking place in order to adjust the program to meet the needs of the individuals, but to also gain a better understanding of what is Autism Spectrum Disorder. After consultations with these institutions here is a couple of important aspects learned:

  • Behavioral Traits
  • Interactive
  • Structure

All of the above aspects are incorporated into program development and will become part of training. In behavioral traits we discuss how individuals with ASD do not always have the best social engagement skills, poor eye contact and rocking in place for example. During our annual living history camp we bring in extra staff/volunteers to portray different people in history. We provided formal training for those additional members in order to prepare them for the ASD individuals coming through that day. Due to our living history program involving black powder weapons it is very important to know about sensory overload associated with ASD. We have devised two ways to tackle this objective: 1.) Provide repeated warnings to the loud noise along with demonstrating how to cover ears, 2.) Provide a video showing the firing of a musket/canon for the group, along with pausing to provide a warning of the loud noise. Both of the tactics have been very successful in preventing sensory overloads in audience members.

The next two, interactive and structure, work hand in hand with each other. When inviting Arts N Autism to our living history camp we provide a detailed schedule to activities of the day which is something the individuals are used to in their everyday lives. If you can incorporate structure into the program too, the individuals respond well. One part of our living history programs is to experience being recruited as an 18th century French Marine. At the end participants are given a wooden musket and period style hat then taught the same drill people were over 250 years ago. Every time I do this part of the program ASD audiences (along with all audiences) respond really well to the immersion activity. It also makes the session more interactive for the audience. We also include historical objects and foodstuffs that individuals can touch, taste and smell in order be able actually feel history in their hands. Principles applied to these programs have been used successfully to update other programs offered by the museum.

Due to having a limited education staff (only one full time member) difficulties do exist with researching how to tackle the problem of providing educational program for audiences with ASD and also continuing with outreach towards these groups. Eventually we are going to need to address the problem due to the sheer volume of individuals being diagnosed with ASD, 1 in 88 currently. Museum, historic sites, parks, zoos, etc. need to be able to accommodate these audiences in order to not lose out on reaching a large audience which is part of our society. Currently we have some institutions providing occasional programs specifically geared towards these audiences, but it requires extra staff and time, whereas if this type of program development is in place already groups can be brought in on short notice to enjoy what the institution has to offer. In order to help facilitate this goal it would be great to have a network of individuals/institutions who are interested in providing support to each other for establishing these programs. An important aspect would be to include advocacy groups such as Autism Speaks and state Autism Societies in order to provide expert technical knowledge plus legitimacy to our efforts.

~ Brian Mast, The University of West Alabama

Back to this Working Group’s homepage.

Discussion

8 comments
  1. Michele Hartley says:

    In other posts I have noted that resources, especially for outreach are far too limited. I like the idea of creating partnerships across institutions to try to leverage resources. Does anyone have examples of successful partnerships across institutions that share resources that could be used as a model? Are there any examples that include larger institutions? For smaller ones, what were the sizes of their staff and could this be a factor in the partnership’s success?

    1. Brian Mast says:

      Michele,

      I can tell you staffing is a concern for us. With only 1 staff member for providing interpretation (both traditional and digital) it is difficult to keep pace with everyone without the benefit of cloning. Currently I am looking at incorporating some of the resources already posted to be incorporated into docent/volunteer training in order to expand our capabilities.

    2. Kelly Enright says:

      I would like to see local colleges and universities partner with museums on accessibility and universal design. This would bring museums/historic sites the programs or exhibit complements they need while training the next generation of public historians in the implementation of these issues. I don’t know any models, but I think student projects or community-engaged course projects might be one way to do this

  2. Drew Robarge says:

    It seems that you have a successful model of incorporating individuals with ASD into existing program with just a little more training and some thinking in how they might respond to certain activities. Then at the end, you seem to want separate programming similar to Ashley Terrell-Rea’s statement. Do you feel that the existing program doesn’t adequately meet the needs of individuals with ASD or why there would be a need for additional programming given the limitations of staff and resources?

  3. It would be great to bring people with autism into the planning process from the beginning. I’d suggest approaching a group such as Autism Self Advocacy Network (ASAN) who might have some suggestions.

    1. Brian Mast says:

      Catherine, thank you! I will most defiantly check them out.

  4. Brian Mast says:

    Drew, with me doing some of these program I feel like this is more that can be done. It is a good starting point, but I want to try more. My thoughts may not have translated properly to paper, but we do have some limitations due to staff and our museum also covers science (dinosaurs!) which is appealing to the non profits I have done programs for. Also, some of the other programs done are not compatible for individuals with ASD and I would like them redesigned to meet those needs. To do that I need help from people in the ASD community (which is being done through the non profits with him we are partnering) and crowd source with others in the public history field in order to do the best job possible because I am afraid that it is not being done by me.

  5. John Little says:

    I enjoy reading about the success of your program, and I wonder if it might be possible to work with ASD groups and integrate training into the existing program, as Drew asks. It seems you have had some real success, and perhaps between Ashley’s and your experience, it might be possible to combine the additional training and solicit ideas from people working with the other programs to help redesign them to be more ASD-friendly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.