PROPOSAL TYPE

Structured Conversation

SEEKING
  • Seeking General Feedback and Interest
  • Seeking Additional Presenters
RELATED TOPICS
  • Material Culture
  • Museums/Exhibits
  • Social Justice
ABSTRACT

This structured conversation is meant to explore ideas together for exhibitions related to the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence. Assuming that many museums and cultural institutions will commemorate this important date in 2026, this session is meant to be a conversation about how we might look past traditional exhibition narratives and workshop possibilities that include the reinterpretation of art and historical collections to explore the meanings of freedom and democracy.

DESCRIPTION

The goal for this proposal is to determine if there is interest among other historians and museum professionals to have an open dialogue about ways to approach the commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence. Specifically, I am interested in the exploration of the topic through non-traditional exhibition narratives. Rather than a retelling of the story of American independence, how might museums and cultural organizations develop exhibitions that ask questions about the modern meaning and understanding of freedom and democracy in the context of this historical commemoration. How can we explore this by re-interpreting historical collections, commissioning new works, etc. as a way of connecting the present with the past for museum visitors, encouraging them to ask questions. For example, the Michigan State University Museum holds a large historical and cultural collection. How might we reinterpret some of these pieces welcoming non-western, immigrant perspectives, among others, to better identify and understand diverse views about what freedom and democracy might mean?

I am hoping through this preliminary proposal, to determine if there is interest in a conversation like this at the conference and to identify others who might like to participate in a structured conversation around these ideas. Additionally, I would welcome additional panelists and feedback/suggestions about whether the structured conversation format is most appropriate. The hope is that by exchanging ideas in an open discussion many seeds will be planted for planning events and exhibitions in 2026 with ample time to submit grant proposals, etc.


If you have a direct offer of assistance, sensitive criticism, or wish to pass along someone’s contact information confidentially, please get in contact directly: Teresa Goforth, Michigan State University, [email protected]

ALL FEEDBACK AND OFFERS OF ASSISTANCE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY JULY 7, 2023. If you have general ideas or feedback to share, please feel free to use the comments feature below.

Discussion

6 comments
  1. Anne Chance says:

    I would be interested in being a panelist. I am currently finishing my PhD in International Conflict Management. The subject of my dissertation is how to measure the effect of heritage site inscription on direct and structural violence. I have been researching the impacts of sites and narratives and designed a quantitative method of measurement across several contexts. The upshot of that is what do we look at before we inscribe a site so that we do no harm to the local and/or marginalized people; how do measure the impact what of what exists, and my follow-up to this paper/book will be how do we arrive at difficult decisions around heritage that are a win-win for everyone.

  2. Megan van Frank says:

    This might be a little different from what you’ve said you want but will mention anyway… The Smithsonian Traveling Exhibition Service has the Museum on Main Street (MoMS) program that partners with state humanities councils and local host sites to tour Smithsonian exhibitions through rural America. Each host site creates a local companion exhibit and public programming to engage their community in themes brought by the exhibition. MoMS is currently traveling an exhition called Voices & Votes that encourages host communities to tackle the modern meaning of democracy. The exhibition website is here https://museumonmainstreet.org/VoicesVotes
    If you want a contact, am happy to put you in touch.

  3. Nichelle Frank says:

    This sounds like a great idea, Teresa! If you haven’t reached out to History Colorado folks, they’ve got a project on both the nation’s anniversary and Colorado’s: https://www.historycolorado.org/america-250-colorado-150.

  4. Nichelle Frank says:

    This sounds like a great idea, Teresa! If you haven’t reached out to History Colorado folks yet, they’ve got a project combining the nation’s and the state’s history that would probably align with your vision: https://www.historycolorado.org/america-250-colorado-150.

  5. Nichelle Frank says:

    Great idea, Teresa! I’ve posted a comment twice but it hasn’t shown up so apologies for any multiples. You could consider reaching out to people at History Colorado who are working on a 250-150 commemoration project for the nation and Colorado: https://www.historycolorado.org/america-250-colorado-150

  6. Jennifer Ortiz says:

    Utah could speak on our 250 efforts–the Peoples of Utah Revisited efforts, our flagship project for America250. We are building off of a bicentennial project: https://history.utah.gov/public-history/peoples-of-utah/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.